Superstition Speech

Superstitions To inform my interview ab give international commonly practiced superstitions, their meaning, origins, and what affects they need on our sounds and commonly practiced usances. Hi My name is Sarah &038 to twenty-four hours I am going to talk to you ab show up superstitions. fit to ranting blah superstition is delimitate as blah blah blah. How m either a(prenominal) of you possess ever crossed your fingers for descente slew, or got a dinky neural ab forbidden something big(p) happening on Friday the thirteenth? I would bet that each(prenominal) of you buzz turned said or boast heard some corpse say idol put forward You after a sneeze.Have any of you ever wondered where the traditions of Halloween came from? Or maybe wherefore it is judgment to be inquisitive set for the stableboy to see the bride before the married orthodontic braces up rite? Today I am going to enlighten you with the answer to these questions and lots more. I. For the appr oximately part superstitions can be placed into 2 categories, unsloped or stinky luck, many a(prenominal) of them overly have deeply religious meaning and do symbolism. A. Good prospect 1. You must rush on wood 3 clock after mentioning tidy fortune or the roughshod mettles pass on demolish things for you. )The tradition traces back to an ancient irreligious belief that heart and soul resided in trees and that by knocking on the wood, you were paying a small tribute to them by acknowledging them, and could betoken on them for protection against ill-fortune. Also, you were thanking them for their move evokes and good luck. 2. amazeing two fingers (the middle and pointing fingers) on angiotensin converting enzyme hand as a sign of hopefulness or desire for a particular outcome. a)This is probably the superstition that is most widely used today. By do the sign of the Christian faith with our fingers, evil spirits would be prevented from destroying our chances of g ood fortune.It is also used as an facial expression Cross your fingers is often told to someone hoping for good luck or a particular outcome. Sometimes, when someone tells a lie, they pass on cross their fingers (usually tail end their back). This somehow absolves them from the consequences or makes the lie non count. See a centime pluck it up, all day long you ordain have good luck. b)Finding a penny and picking it up is believed to sour a day of good luck. Finding a penny with heads up is considered luckier. It is believed that this penny should not be spent keeping it full can bring you fortune.Any metal was considered Gods place to mankind 3. Saying God Bless You when someone sneezes. (1)The blessing of those who sneeze started when the capital plague took hold of Europe. Sufferers began sneezing violently, and as such, were bound to die. The Pope passed a fair play requiring large subject to bless the sneezer. At the akin time, it was expected that anybody sneezi ng would cover their embouchure with a cloth or their hand. This was evidently to stop the spreading of the disease, but many believed that it was to keep the spirit intact.Sneezing into the air would allow the someone to escape and death would be imminent. humanity has long been equating the soul with breath. It was estimate that when one sneezed, the soul briefly flew out of the body, and this aptitude allow an evil spirit to take up residence within. On the separate hand, it is also said that blessing someone who sneezes is necessary because their heart skips a beat when they sneeze it is wishing them continued good health B. Bad Luck 1. Breaking a mirror leave bring seven years of rotten luck. a)Romans tagged the broken mirror a sign of bad luck.The length of the appointed misfortune, 7 years, came from the Roman belief that mans body was physically rejuvenated every 7 years, and he became, in effect, a impudently man. Ones reflexion in a mirror is thought to be th e representation of his or her soul or sacred state. Breaking the mirror, and wherefore the individuals reflection, would bring damage to their soul and spiritual hardship. Taking the instals outside and burying them in the moonlight could avoid this. 2. Open an umbrella indoors and bad luck will rain on you. a)Origin can be traced back to when umbrellas were used as cheer protection.Opening one indoors supposedly was unsavory to the sun (or sun god) and would bring his peevishness down upon the offender 3. Walking infra a ladder will bring bad luck. a)Excluding the obvious that something might chance upon on you from above the belief that pass under a ladder will bring bad luck seems to musical theme from the ladder forming a triangle with the border and the ground. This represents the Holy Trinity, and if you violate this by entering the space, it puts you in league with the devil, and youre probably to incur Gods wrath. 4. Friday the thirteenthThe belief that thirt een brings bad luck is an extremely pervasive belief throughout many societies, and is strong plenteous that many major hotels and high rises tralatitiously either build only dozen floors, or, if they want to go higher, skip labeling the thirteenth floor entirely Many people refuse to stay on the 13th floor, or in room 13. nation stay home from work, for fear of something bad happening. Most airports dont have a thirteenth gate. There are many theories as to why this belief is held. One is that Judas, know as the Betrayer of savior, was the 13th member present at the break down Supper.Paraskevidekatriaphobia is the official term for the fear of Friday the Thirteenth. Jesus was said to have been crucified on Friday and the number of guests at the party of the Last Supper was 13, with the 13th guest being Judas, the traitor. II. Superstition plays a role in several of our nationwide celebrated Holidays and traditions. A. Halloween blah blah blah 1. Costumes- The people of Irela nd at that time were pagans and spirits were a part of their religion. Their beliefs involved good and evil spirits and would strive to live in harmony with both.This is where the bespoken of grooming up in costumes came in. On all in all Hallows Eve the spirits of the dead, good and evil, were believed to mountain pass the streets until sunrise so anyone out might run into an evil spirit and baffle possessed. To keep from becoming possessed, the villagers would set in animal skins and paint their faces to scare a way of life the bad spirits. 2. Trick or treat- it began in Ireland as part of their end-of-summer festival. October 3 beginning(a) is the get going day of the Celtic calendar and November 1st begins the rude(a) year.On this last day of the year it what a widely-held belief that on this one night the spirits of the dead could chat the living. Family members would leave a plate of viands and a place set at the table to welcome their spiritual guests. hatful would also leave gifts of food out to keep from angering the evil spirits and causing them to do mischievousness. It was a preventative measure. The truism finesse or treat was a question, because if you left no treat you may wake up the side by side(p) dayspring to find you had been victim of a trick or some form of mischief B. Thanksgiving blah blah During Thanksgiving, it is handed-down to roast a turkey.When it is served, its also traditional for two people to take the wishing bone (the birds clavicle) each making a wish, they hustle apart the bone to break it. The person ending up with the bigger piece will supposedly get his or her wish. Although Thanksgiving is an American holiday, the wishbone custom was brought over to the new world by the Pilgrims from England, where it had long been in practice. The ritual of jailbreak apart the wishbone can be traced back to the ancient Romans, Etymologists claim that the expression get a friendly break ab initio applied to the pers on winning the larger half in a wishbone tug-of-war. III. There are many wed traditions that may seem a little silly and far fetched, and even though most of us dont know their origin or meaning, we notwithstanding include them in our union day rituals. A. Its bad luck for the groom to see the bride in her hymeneals dress before the ceremony. 1. During the time when arranged marriages were custom, the couple wasnt allowed to see each other before the wedding at all. The wedding symbolized a business deal amidst two families and a father would have been pleased for his daughter to marry a man from a rich family.But he also feared that if the groom met the bride before the wedding and thought she wasnt attractive, hed call off the wedding, casting disgrace onto the bride and her family. Therefore, it became tradition that the bride and groom were only allowed to consider at the wedding ceremony so that the groom did not have the chance to change his mind. And that veil the bri de wears? Its original inclination was also to keep the groom from determination out what the bride looked like until the last possible minute, when it was too late to back out of the transactionB. Ringer Finger 1. C. The person who catches the brides bouquet or garter when she cut downes it over her head will be the next to get married. 1. The story behind this tradition is downright dirty. In medieval times, it was considered lucky to get a fragment of the brides clothing, so hordes of guests would follow the newlywed couple into their wedding chamber after the ceremony and stand around the bed, trying to rip pieces of the brides gown right off her body.Because dresses were often torn apart, brides searched for alternatives to preserve their gowns and began throwing their bouquets to take away guests while they make their getaway. When the bride and groom made it safely into their wedding chamber, the groom would thence crack open the door and toss the brides garter to the th rongs of people postponement outside as a way of saying that he was about to legal tender the deal. D.The groom must carry his new wife across the threshold of their new home to prevent bad luck. 1. In ancient cultures, the threshold of the home was considered to be a hotbed of lurking, unattached evil spirits, and since a new bride was particularly vulnerable to spirit intrusion, especially through the soles of her feet, the groom ensured that his wife would not bring any bad spirits into the house by carrying her inside. closure

World water crisis

sustown(prenominal)able Catchment vigilance Principles and Practice EssayThe introductions fresh body of water is norm entirelyy discussed in the literature as cosmos a finite alternative downstairs increa r shuttinger force per unit area from the greater demands creation laid upon it glob solelyy ( Postel 2000, Hamdey et al 2003, Oki and Kanae 2006, UNEP 2007 ) . It has accordingly catch a extremely combative pick, and in recent old ages the focal presage of much argument on how surpass to invest off it with the latest favoured paradigm ( interrogatively in bringed postulates ) being that of holistic sustainability achieved utilizing the best drill of basin-wide statement ( Biswas 2004, Watson et al 2007 ) . Such an polish up is particularly emphasised in cardinal policies much(prenominal) as Agenda 21 and the piss Framework leading, with the latter executeing the creative action of River Basin management Plans by enactment for all EU member n ations. This constitution will discourse whether t here(predicate) actually is a universe weewee crisis, and if so to what extent river basin program line ( RBM ) dirty dog suffice to hand to this. Case examples much(prenominal)(prenominal) as the Murray-Darling basin are employ to discourse this in circumstance.Harmonizing to the research of Oki and Kanae ( 2006 pp1068 ) the mobile ingestion of renewable freshwater imagerys is impregnable below its Malthusian bounds, with however 10 % of the maximal available bluish piss and 30 % of green piss being soon employ. However, because its distribution both in measure and quality for intent is spatially and temporally un unconstipated ( figure 1 ) it consequences in urine emphasiss bing by a demand and supplement instability. Gleick 1998, Hamdey et al 2003, and UNEP 2007 amongst former(a)s denote figures such as already 80 states with 40 % of the universe population impose serious water system shortages ( Hamdey et al 2003 pp3 ) , and more than than a meg people in the under loftyly- veritable universe deficiency addition to safe imbibing water ( Gleick 1998 pp487 ) . This suggests that water supply emphasis is a major roving issue ( as reflected in the powderennium ontogeny Goals ) and feature with the expected alterations in population growth/demographics ( figure 2 ) , criterion of feel, economic development and clime alteration, such emphasiss are expected to castigate through increa lecture the instability. This is particularly real for developing states since an estimated 90 % of the 3 billion people expected to add to the mundane population by 2050 will chanty in such states with some(prenominal) of which are already under high water emphasis ( UN 2007 cited UNESCO 2009 ) . At what point down pat(p) the line an existent absolute crisis at a state graduated put ski binding is r distributivelyed is still yet to meet although assumption the societal and economic value prone to piddle, and its 3-dimensional consequence upon nutrient supply, ecosystem wellness, and criterion of life for exemplar, it may already bespeak a crisis is afoot ( Newson et al 1999 cited Newson 2000 ) . This is particularly veritable if freshwater entree is considered as a basic human right ( Gleick 1998 ) . expect this, RBM is oftentimes discussed in the literature as being a feasible steerage alternative to turn to the crisis, since its attack is holistic and across-the-board. Its current favor comes from the situation that contradictory the traditional response to piddle deficits intercommunicate through developing more supplies frequently via unsustainable beginnings and hard technology patterns such as damming rivers ( Hamdey et al 2003 ) it tries to accomplish long circumstance sustainability through embracing country-use planning, environmental prudence, and rural policy into the education of all bug out and subsurface piss at bottom a catchment. This theoretically allows for all of the direct and collateral natural and anthropogenetic demands placed upon the resource to be addressed and met under a best-practice organisation to accomplish an optimum germane(predicate) direction result.A authoritative exercise of where such a policy has been productive is in the Murray-Darling basin, southeast Australia. The RBM government here is a extremely evolved signifier of institutional agreements fore some(prenominal) started in 1917, and accordingly limited through clip, to suffer into the desired results and alter force per unit areas upon the 1 one million million Km2 five jurisdictional province catchment. At its bosom the strategy seeks to promote and set impressive direction planning for tho, cost-effective and sustainable impost of body of water, impart and other resources ( Pigram 1999 pp108 ) , which it achieves through a hydraulic attack utilizing top-down policy devising and bottom-up executi on, coordinated through the cardinal Murray-Darling bearing ( Shar et al 2005 ) . In making this it allows for all of the cardinal stakeholders at heart each province to reach into and discourse how best to construction off the piss resources to maximize the hearer biophysical, economic and societal involvements non merely within each province ( and its several piddle portion ) , but for the whole catchment. theoretically this coordinates the upstream- downriver involvements and encourages more productive/ economical practice session of body of water through bettering engineering such as crop-per-drop ( Postel 2000 ) , which in bend allows all of the water system demands to be attained equitably. When this is combined with the top-down organization system which sets legislative criterions necessitating to be met by every province sing the weewee quality and measure, bionomical demands and permitted debasement tips through land practise policies, it ensures that direct ion is non inactive and behind the mend catchment force per unit areas upon the water resource. This is non to state merely the system is perfect since its effectivity depends on the cooperation of each province authorities, and as of yet no true luxuriant sustainability has been achieved ( Pigram 1999 ) . Although, with approves to the universe H2O crisis it is swooning to see that in this grammatical case, along with many others, RBM is holding a positive impact. This is because it is promoting through Torahs and other means the more efficient and just usage of H2O ( Postel 2000 ) , whilst sing the whole basin and its long status demands and force per unit areas such as clime alteration. In making so the consequence of future crises/pressures may be lessened.Similar RBM governments in addition exist under other semipolitical systems such as throughout the whole of the European sum ( referable to piss Framework Directive statute law ) and in siemens Africa ( since 19 98 ) . In the latter Gregersen et Al ( 2007 ) states that although the government is working it is non yet sustainable, since effectual direction systems take several old ages to develop and offer no ready do solutions. Therefore at its national degree it is non to the adequate able to turn to the H2O crisis, although it apparently is on the manner to seek to make so through utilizing a direction system which seeks to accomplish this from the beginning.It must be said nevertheless that closely of the palmy RBM governments are in positive formalised society states where the cardinal H2O emphasiss are frequently far dispirit in the first case ( see figure 1 ) . Such systems wherefore stick out non be straight transferred in the midst of political establishments easy due(p) to the context in which they were basically formed to run into within the founding state sing the hydraulic, climatic, demographic and socio-economic conditions and the construction of the H2O field ( B arrow 1998, Hunt 1999, Shar et al 2005 ) . For illustration Hu ( 1999 ) , Malanu et Al ( 1999 ) ( cited Shar et al 2005 ) and Hunt ( 1999 ) each found that the Murray-Darling RBM government could non be successfully transferred to the Chinese, Vietnamese and Solomon Island contexts because of such issues with Shar et Al ( 2005 pp46 ) logical thinking that reassigning RBM governments between developed and developing states is peculiarly debatable since the jobs developing state happen critical have either remained undefendable or irrelevant in developed state river basins, such as land H2O development. Therefore in respect to the universe H2O crisis it provides small usage in this sense, particularly since the greatest stresses/crises are expected to happen here.Hunt ( 1999 ) whence argues that the contextual picture between policy development and application is cardinal to pull offing the H2O resource successfully. In puting the right model to put looseness and drama in provide s an effectual environment to turn to the H2O crisis in, whether through RBM or non. In some instances I would besides reason that to turn to the current H2O crisis RBM can merely be used as portion of the solution, due to the interconnectivity of the H2O resource with criterion of life ( associating back to the Millennium Development Goals ) and economic development. If full RBM sustainability is strived for under the current conditions, inclusive of the environmental demand, it may merely function to parentage the current crisis such as in Jordan which withdraws some of its supply unsustainably from non-renewable aquifers ( Macoun and El Naser 1999 ) . The aforementioned(prenominal) is true for other basins globally such as in the Colorado, Tennessee and Yangtze River basins, since in regularize to run into their yesteryear and current demands, supply had to be increased through keeping H2O in dam. This could be seen in some instances as being unsustainable due to the impact it has on the basin and even though the two former river basins are now managed under RBM governments ( Newson 2009 ) they are runing under modified conditions. RBM still has value nevertheless in advancing more efficient H2O usage ( Postel 2000 ) and sustainable honorable direction, so hence should non be altogether ignored. The contextual tantrum of states as a whole is of import in determination the best attack to turn to the universe H2O crisis.RBM may besides dangle in turn toing the universe H2O crisis excessively if it fails to be effectual itself in the first case. For illustration since RBM seeks to accomplish just sustainability ( Barrow 1998 ) , unequal power manduction may ensue in such a failure. To represent this if a dike was allowed to keep back more H2O for power coevals it would set increase force per unit area on the available measure of flow for ecological demands and irrigative agribusiness uses amongst others. Similarly if a mill was allowed higher polluti on degrees so the alterations in the H2O quality could pull a system closer to sing a H2O crisis ( presuming it was already extremely hard-pressed ) . This is particularly true in non-integrated RBM governments, since the antithetical involvements of each RBM stakeholder group, such as land proprietors, husbandmans, developers and environmentalists would be over-prioritised in their several RBMP compared to others. This therefore may be uneffective due to the differing overall results, necessitating some coordination and compromising to be effectual in footings of long-run holistic direction.A similar weakness may besides happen within world-wide river basins if a common-goal transboundary direction understanding can non be established in pattern even if it is agreed upon politically. This is the instance directly between Israel and Palestine despite the fact of the road to recovery ( common end ) program. Israel in 2003 abstracted 95 % of the H2O from the diverted Lower Jorda n to run into its ain abstraction demands and left Palestine with merely 5 % . Hence Palestine is in a H2O crisis since it can non run into its ain H2O demands ( Frederiksen 2003 ) . To be effectual hence RBM plans in the first case demand to be important, just, co-ordinated and true to RBMs sign intent. Merely so can it assist in turn toing the universe H2O crisis.In decision, it can be successfully argued that RBM is a worthwhile direction option to prosecute in relation to turn toing the universe H2O crisis. Where such governments are good established and operational, such as in the Murray-Darling catchment, its sustainable attack to direction allows for all of the demands and threats/pressures to the fresh water resource ( such as inordinate fodder overflow from ill managed land ) to be identified and dealt with equitably and consequently within the basins long-run transporting capacity. But, given the contextual tantrum of each state with respects to its current resource base , H2O force per unit areas, and demands/needs, it may intend that in the expansive strategy of things RBM may non be the most suited direction option to turn to the crisis with on its ain. Interestingly RBM is harmonizing to Shar et Al 2005 is harder to implement in developing states due to its developed background, but it is such developing states where the H2O emphasiss are already at high emphasis degrees and expected to decline from most through the predicted population growing and clime alteration force per unit areas ( UNESCO 2009 ) . alone(predicate) clip will state how multipurpose and politically favoured RBM is in turn toing the crisis, and whether it is keep to be used entirely or alongside other H2O direction constructs such as virtual H2O sharing.BibliographyBarrow. C.J. ( 1998 ) River Basin Development Planning and Management A Critical Review in valet de chambre Development 26 ( 1 ) pp171-186Biswas. A. K ( 2004 ) Integrated irrigate Resources Management A Reasse ssment. Water International 29 ( 2 ) pp248-256Frederiksen ( 2003 ) The universe H2O crisis branchings of political relations trumping basic duty. Water Resources Development 19 ( 4 ) pp593-615Gleick. P ( 1998 ) . The human right to H2O. Water policy 1 pp487-503Gregersen. H. M, Ffolliott. P. F, Brooks K.N ( 2007 ) . Integrated corner direction connecting people to their land and H2O. Oxfordshire nag InternationalHamedy et Al ( 2003 ) Coping with Water Scarctiy Water Saving and Increasing Water productivity Irrigation and Drainage 52 pp3-20Hunt. C ( 1999 ) Transposing of H2O policies from developed to developing states the instance of exploiter wages. Water International 24 pp293-306Macoun. A, El Naser. H ( 1999 ) Groundwater Resources Management in Jordan form _or_ system of government and Regulatory Issues ( chapter 6 ) . In Salman. M.A. S. ( 1999 ) serviceman Bank Technical Paper no456 Groundwater ratified and Policy Perspectives. Proceedings of a gentleman Bank Seminar. Washington DC The World Bank.Newson. M ( 1997 ) Land, H2O and Development sustainable direction of river basin systems. capital of the United Kingdom RoutledgeNewson. M ( 2000 ) science and sustainability turn toing the universe H2O crisis . Procedures in milieual Science 2 ( 3 ) pp 205-229Newson. M ( 2009 ) Land, H2O and Development sustainable direction of river basin systems. London RoutledgeOki. T, Kanae. S. ( 2006 ) Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources Science 313, pp1068-1072Pigram. J. D ( 1999 ) Australia s Murray-Darling River Basin in A SIWI/IWRA Seminar Stockholm Towards upstream/downstream hydrosolidarity. Capital of sweden ArkpressenPostel. S. L. ( 2000 ) Entering an epoch of H2O scarceness the challenges in front. Ecological Applications 10 ( 4 ) pp941-948Shar. T, Mankin. I, Sakthivadivel. R ( 2005 ) Limits to leapfrogging issues in transporting successful river basin direction establishments in the underdevelop universe. InSvendsen. M ( 2005 ) Irriga tion and river basin direction options for administration and establishments. Oxon CABI publicationUNESCO ( 2009 ) Water in a changing World, World Water Development communicate 3, www.unesco.org/water/wwap/wwdr/ wwdr3/index.shtml 6/10/09 United Nations Environment Programme ( 2007 ) Global environmental learning ability geo-4. Malta Advancement ImperativenessWatson. N, Walker. N, Medd. W ( 2007 ) Critical positions on incorporate H2O direction. Editorial. Geographic diary 173 ( 4 ) pp297-299

'Greenfield vs Brownfield Sites for Housing Development\r'

'Greenfield vs Brownfield Sites for Ho apply Development A Brownfield site is prop up which has been developed antecedently and is or has been occupied by a perm structure. It may be in an urban or rural setting. It does non include agricultural land, forest or parks. Whereas a Greenfield site is Land which has non been occupied by a permanent structure. It usually applies to land in the countryside still butt joint be undeveloped land inwardly an urban setting. Both of these sites can be ideal for the discipline of spic-and-span hovictimization but both as advantageously proceed with benefits and drawbacks to doing so.\r\nFirstly redeveloping Brownfield sites eases pressure on Greenfield sites and is much sustainable. Although Greenfield sites argon often on the edge of towns and cities and may have best access, have less congestion, be in a more(prenominal)(prenominal) pleasant environment and have more space and path to expand. Redeveloping a Brownfield site wo uld cause set up prices to increase in inner city areas as battalion are advance back to the area. This is a benefit for people already living there but, this skill mean that former(a) people cannot cave in the houses, and the council will have to provide for them which may cause problems.\r\nBasic Infrastructure already exists in Brownfield sites but in Greenfield sites un utilize drainage, electricity, roads and so forth would all have to be produced deeming them more expensive. Although Light fabrication and Science Parks favour let out of town locations on Greenfield sites opposed to Brownfield sites and crucially so do their workers who are happier to live away from urban areas. New sites are easier to build on as ashes of previous land use do not need to be open making them more attractive to retail parks, housing developers etc.\r\nBut using Greenfield sites is not sustainable as there is too much pressure on the rural-urban fringe therefore making the development of Brownfield sites a better option. There is an come forth of contamination and making sites safe for development, attached what the land may have been used for before but towns and cities do not want their areas to decay and redeveloping these areas results in more people coming to the area. This helps local businesses as more people means more customers. Building on Greenfield sites on the other hand pulls people out of the towns and cities causation shops etc. aving to re locate on the edge of and towns and cities. In conclusion I feel looking at the benefits and drawbacks of using Brownfield and Greenfield sites for housing redevelopment it would be or so beneficial to use Brownfield sites firstly because it is the more sustainable option also the elemental infrastructure already exists as well as there being habitual transport links already in place in many areas. besides it is would help develop areas which may be suffering and increase house prices within that area, making them more wealthy and hopefully lowering crime rates etc.\r\n'

'Bad Grades Essay\r'

'I am writing to press an explanation for a change in academic performance that is noniceable on my high crop transcript.\r\nFrom the start of my fledgling year until the end of my junior year, it is spare through analysis of my transcript that I contrive been an above average schoolchild consistently throughout my high school career. However, starting at around sniffy 2010, problems arose in my family of which I believe do it impossible for me to continue my 100% focalization on school.\r\nHalfway into my senior year, my contract was laid off from his job. Since he was the solely source of income at that time, our family of five was squeeze to move from our comfortable lives at our quatern bedroom mansion house into our grandmother’s two bedroom house. This was a forceful change for all of us, as we have never shared a house with anyone, especially one of this size. I no longer had a room in which I was able to do my school assignment in silence. This drastic c hange, I believe, break my focus on school because of the precaution it required from me. During my graduation semester I was oftentimes required to miss school by my parents, reason being that I had to stand by out in the movement routine and had to visit an ill uncle out of town.\r\nI take full responsibility of my underperformance during the first semester of my senior year and am not look to make excuses. My main finale in making this letter is just to offer insight on what it is I believe influenced my underperformance.\r\nI sincerely take on you to consider me as an applicant and to not let this recent semester define me as a student. I greatly send word your time in reading this letter.\r\n'