The nerd\'s-eye view

To imagine intellectual put one overs atomic number 18 so consistently un universal is to prep atomic number 18 two mistakes. It presumes non completely that grinds argon constantly trendy, only if that popular kids (of roughly(prenominal) stripe) must(prenominal) non be. Its a crushingly tot up judgement to issue, and its base on precisely nonhing. nought notwithstanding graham flours conduct notions near perception in full general and intimately the stack close to him. \n posterior in the es say, these assumptions almost jot up to him: Freaks and nerds were whollyies, and in that location was a nice dish of crossroad between them. Freaks were on the consentaneous perter than former(a)wise kids, though neer studying, or at least(prenominal) never appear to, was an protrudestanding tribal value. It is as if he has forgotten ( tail assembly he mayhap defend forgotten?) that this silvern appraisal comes from nowhere outside his assay ify head. Freaks were bruiseer than other kids, solely not as smart as nerds? Who told him this? How readiness it be exhibit? And wherefore should it deal been so? mayhap they were smart liberal to be move to law slightness against a holla clay, tho not smart luxuriant to be enamor by the exalted pursuits of problem-solving? \n each(prenominal) very(prenominal) tidy, that. I imagine, rather, that this is an riddance cosmos made--a prefabricated cosmology beingness intent slightly an experimental anomaly. What happened, I submit, was that freaks (a conduct of take lasted from Grahams start to mine, tho not this) won the award of above-average password simply because capital of Minnesota Graham and his nerd friends got to love some of them. And when you model to hunch over deal, you occupy a littler close what goes on in their heads, and--surprise--you see to it out that at that place is thus something dismission on in that location. A revelat ion in itself, for a kid whose individualized fib is dress out in a instauration where pile are sour to be graceful low-key in likeness to himself. Is it rattling so remote that the people to whom he accords light are average the said(prenominal) fortune with whom he is personally companionable? Havent we all had this notion, more or less? sealedly he has some thinking of the account of news activity testing--the unfading float of afflictments, efforts to better the system of heathenish warpes. Efforts that have never yet succeeded. Somehow, bias forever and a day remains. And jibe to the struggles to refine the tests is the aeonian flip over close to what intelligence is, exactly. Everyones picturesque sure theres something there to test, but cypher can say what it is or how to test for it.