affirmative action Essay -- essays research papers

Introduction approbative action at law in higher education should be abolished. College admissions should be ground on what the admissions board is looking for, not what the g overnment says should be required. In this paper, I bequeath present evidence to support that position.     At atomic number 53 time, favourable action was a needed and legitimate policy. Segregation has existed centering too much in the past and has left people discover of jobs, out of certain areas of town, and schooling. We needed to make a law that would stick out rid of segregation, and help everybody assimilate or just live peacefully without discrimination. When a majority the southern where rebelling and would not every last(predicate)ow African Americans in their stores, schools, etc, affirmative action was justifiable. But is it today?     Much of the affirmative action debate is, and should be centered on education. Many of the critics whom at one an d only(a) time also believed that the preferential treatment shown to lower the discrimination towards minority groups is something that should be eliminated. Being that American society has become less discriminatory, affirmative action may be less necessary. Discrimination is something that will unendingly be an issue there will always be rearward individuals who cannot overlook their own prejudices for the greater good. However, there are fewer of these people. With declines in racism, we should also seek to eliminate the reverse racism now organism displayed towards college while male applicants. This is an issue that effects potential students, and those who get rejected merely apply to another school. How can this issue of accepting minorities over others because be brought to the attention of the lawmakers without making it seem as if there will be less opportunities for minority groups? Equality is a very pure topic that has to be danced around with the potential for a m isconception of what is trying to be achieved.      In the early 1960s the federal government implemented programs such as the National defence Student Loan Program (NDSL), work-study programs, and the National Defense Educational Act (NDEA). These programs made it easier for minority groups, peculiarly African Americans, to happen financial help. Equal opportunity grants also helped enroll more minorities, especially b needs. At the time, these ... ... succeeding in the collegiate environment. A fallacy that is universal is that minorities score much lower then the white majority. This is not true(p) there is a small gap, but it is not significant. Yes minorities quite frequently do have to deal with crowded casterooms, teachers with less advanced degrees, and the lack of counseling recourses that are available for predominantly white, suburban schools. However, is this a rationality to give funding to those who lack? America is based on the ideologic b elief that "you can be whatever you want to be, or, work thorny enough and you will achieve your goals." To place this belief in the minds of all callowness should be enough. To place this in the minds of all the same youth but then give preferential treatment to the minority class is a blatant display of reverse racism that should be through with(p) away with henceforth. References CitedThe College Board Review August 1999, nary(prenominal)188Leonard Biard-College Student September 2001 V.35, No. 3Comparative Educational Review V.47 No.1, February 2003The College Board Review No.189/190, January 2000College and University journal V.79 No.1, Summer 2003Educational Theory Winter 2002,V.52 N.1