By Using Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) the Tobacco Industry

pic Assignment Cover Sheet 200336 Business donnish Skills School of Business James schoolchild last name Martin Student first name 17508979 Student number 200336 Business donnish Skills whole name and number Thursday store day 330PM 5PM Workshop time EB. G. 7 Workshop room Tyrone Kirchengast Workshop discipline taste Title of assignment 1000 words plus eferences Length In Workshop Week 14 (beginning 28 whitethorn) Date due 31/05/2012 Date submitted Parramatta Campus enrolment Declaration I hold a simulate of this assignment if the original is lost or damaged. ? I hereby own that no. sort of this assignment or product has been copied from any whatever other students work or from any other descent except where due acknowledgement is made in the assignment. ? No part of the assignment/product has been written/produced for me by any other someone except where collaboration has been authorised by the subject lecturer/tutor concerned. ? I am awargon that this work whitethorn be reproduced and submitted to piracy detection softw ar programs for the purpose of detecting possible piracy (which whitethorn retain a copy on its database for future plagiarism checking). I am aw ar that the plagiarism detection softw atomic number 18 programs are non the solitary(prenominal) means that will be pulmonary tuberculosisd to detect plagiarism (i. e. having a zero report whitethorn still result in plagiarism). Sig genius ______________________________________ Note An examiner or lecturer/tutor has the correct to non mark this assignment if the above resolution has not been signed. seek Assessment examination By using incorporated hearty state (CSR) the baccy industriousness is seeking to deepen their un respect equal to(p) universe image. prise this strategy using three ethical rules of the Global Business Standards Codex. character reference your canvass belowThe baccy plant persistence ha s come under interrogatory regarding their use of corporate duty to change an unethical image that has plagued them since the last mentioned half of the 20th century. The purpose of this probe is to evaluate the use of corporate complaisant debt instrument using three ethical prescripts of the global bloodline standards leaf-book and studies reviewing the baccy diligences use of corporate social responsibility in relation to the health issues, environmental issues and the social issues concerning the tobacco plant companies. The tobacco industrys use of corporate responsibility to change their unethical macrocosm image is ineffective and disingenuous, as they are patently using this strategy as a defence against public disparagement.The husbandry and production of tobacco carries far-flung environmental impacts which are damaging to the meet eco ashess and natural processes. British Ameri corporation tobacco and Phillip Morris had established supply bonds in the 1990 s as a means of farming tobacco more efficiently aiming to maximise profits (Otanez & Glantz 2010). However these supply fetter were damaging to the environment as tumesce as local communities of ontogeny countries as deforestation and the use of child roil on tobacco plantations became widespread throughout these supply chains. In the 2000s these companies addressed the environmental and labour concerns by redefining their tobacco farming procedures and implementing environmentally sustainable practices.Although it was revealed through the studies undertaken by Otanez & Glantz (2010) that the tobacco farming practices re importanted the same and this attempt to deceive the public was revealed to be a CSR exploit. The use of corporate social responsibility seeks to minimise risks and ill effects maximising economic and social benefits establishing relationships based on invest to promote progress in accordance with ethical principles and moral value (Crisan, CM & Borza 2012). In terms of the Business Standards Codex, the tobacco industry violates the citizenship principle which states that Every employee should act as a responsible citizen in the conjunction. (Stanwick & Stanwick 2009).The principle states that employees must protect and preserve public goods or common lawsuit including sustainability and other environmental issues in order to acquire clientele in an ethical manner. The tobacco industrys attempt to appear ethical was transparent as their line of merchandise practices remained unchanged despite the illusion of addressing the issues. furthermore the tobacco industry uses CSR to uphold the advantageouslybeing of society despite go on to produce lethal products. The health effects which occur as a result of using products manufactured by tobacco companies are widespread and in most cases poisonous. The tobacco companies are well aware of their products deadly nature barely they continue to manufacture and distribute these product s.In an effort to touch their image, the tobacco companies used public relations exploits and funding youth anti-smoking campaigns which use up been proven to be ineffective and in fact a heinous trade cock signaled at underage smokers. (Friedman 2009) baccy companies confirm even gone as far to focus their corporate social responsibility tactics at the education sector in the pretend of scholarships, grants, professorships and even the creation of an entire school ( instauration Health Organisation 2003). This use of corporate social responsibility however was used as more of a defence against public condemnation due to the unchanged nature of their selling practices.On August 17, 2006 the United States District Court found the tobacco industry guilty of a number of allegations of fraud and conspiracy (Friedman 2009). The conduct of the tobacco companies in light of this case was highly unethical in terms of the global barter standards codex in particular the self-importa nce-regard principle which states Protecting the dignity of people in society includes ensuring the kind-hearted rights of health, safety and privacy (Stanwick & Stanwick 2009). Tobacco companies continue to manufacture and distribute products with across-the-board knowledge of the products lethal nature when used as directed, using CSR further as a defence against public scrutiny.Clement-Jones (2004) states that no company producing weapons or growing tobacco can ever be truly socially responsible due to the harmful effects of their products indicating that corporate social responsibility can merely be used as a ray of deception and hypocrisy. The tobacco industrys use of CSR is not only a publicity exploit but a means of self regulation to avoid further government legislation on business and manufacturing practices. By implementing CSR practices into the business conduct of tobacco industry, the companies create a wild representation of responsibility for their actions. This however has come under scrutiny from nongovernmental organizations as calls for international regulation backed up by national legislation to ensure the enforcement of real social responsibility on the corporate world (Hirschhorn 2003).Tobacco companies have been some of the first organisations in the former(a) years of the 1900s to realise the value of public relations and gaining alimentation for their industry (Thomson 1998). The tobacco industrys use of CSR is nothing more than companies defend their profits and satisfying their shareholders. Hastings & Liberman (2009) state that CSR is another means of progression and sponsorship for the tobacco companies, by conducting socially responsible causes tobacco companies are able to inadvertently sponsor these causes and promote their products giving further attest that the tobacco companies have ulterior motives to their use of CSR.The transparency principle of the global business standards codex states that employees are not to operate in a delusory manner and that business should be conducted openly and honestly (Stanwick & Stanwick 2009). The tobacco industry fails to sweep up this principle through their use of CSR as they operate in a deceptive manner. CSR can however be an effective tool for improving an organisations reputation and ethical image such is the case of Alcoa, an Australian based aluminium manufacturing company which improved its standing in the community with effective CSR practices (Black, Sydney-Smith & Zhao 2009). The use of CSR by organisations such as tobacco companies can never truly be an effective strategy as pertinacious as the manufacture of harmful products continues under these organisations.Using three principles of the business standards codex as well as the use of CSR by the tobacco industry to secure public stand up, it has been shown that these strategies have ulterior motives and are purely marketing tools used by these companies to conceal the promotion of their p roducts which is banned by legislation. CSR however can remain a highly effective tool for public relations as long as the intentions of those organisations are beneficial to society. References symbol your reference list in alphabetical order below Black, LD, Sydney-Smith, K & Zhao, Y 2009, How Business Behaviour Contributes to Reputation and Perceptions of Performance A baptismal font Study of Alcoa of Australia, viewed April 2012, .Clement-Jones, T 2004 Coporate social responsibility bottom-line issue or public relations exercise? in J Hancock (ed), Investing in corporate social responsibility a guide to best practice, business planning & the UKs leading companies, 1st edn, Kogan Page Limited. , London, United Kingdom. Crisan, CM & Borza, A 2012, Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibilities International Business Research, 2 February, viewed 4 April 2012, http//search. proquest. com. ezproxy. uws. edu. au/docview/963357717/fulltextPDF? accountid=36155. Friedm an, L 2009, Tobacco industry use of corporate social responsibility tactics as a sword and shield on second hand smoke issues, journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 19-827 viewed 11 April 2012, University of Western Sydney Database, inside 10. 1111/j. 1748-720X. 2009. 00453. x Hirschhorn, N 2004, Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry hope or hype? , Tobacco Control, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 445-453, viewed 7 whitethorn 2012, University of Western Sydney Library database, DOI 10. 1136/tc. 2003. 006676 Hastings, G, Liberman, J 2009 Tobacco corporate social responsibility and fairy godmothers the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control slays a modern myth, Tobacco Control, vol 18 no. 2 pp 73-74, viewed 9 whitethorn 2012, University of Western Sydney Library database, DOI 10. 1136/tc. 2008. 029264 Otanez, M, Glantz, G 2011 Social responsibility in tobacco production?Tobacco companies use of green supply chains to obscure the real cost of tobacco farming, Tobacco Control, vol 20 no. 6, pp403-411, viewed 5 May 2012, University of Western Sydney Library database, DOI 10. 1136/tc. 2010. 039537 Stanwick, P & Stanwick S 2009, The foundation of ethical thought , in Campbell, N (ed. ) , Business donnish skills, 4th edn, Pearson Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW Thomson, S. R. 1998, national Relations and the Tobacco Industry Examining the Debate on Practitioner Ethics, Journal of Mass Media Ethics Exploring Questions of Media Morality, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 152-164, viewed 3 April 2012, UWS Library database, DOI 10. 207/s15327728jmme1303_2 World Health Organiation 2003, Tobacco industry and corporate responsibility an inherent contradiction view 3 April 2012, . ESSAY /100 sort out Fail unavoidably Work Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction grammatical construction Introduction in that respect is no entrance. The introduction The introduction The introduction The introduction The introduction Has no percipient dissertation a ffirmation ORHas a thesis statement and Has a thesis statement Has a clear thesis statement Has a clear thesis statement that The thesis statement is not Outlines the main points that Outlines the main points that that relates back to the relates back to the nous relate to the essay doubt brave out your position but whitethorn orsupport your position but may orquestion Outlines the main points that and may not be in the correct order. may not be in the correct order Outlines the main points that support your position in the correct Does not dodge the main points and support your position in the order and that support your position. Has a few familiar statements correct order and Has a few general statements about related to the topic. Has a few general statements the topic that clarifies your about the topic. interpretation of the question. /10 0 0. 5-4. 5 5. 0-6. 0 6. 5-7. 0 7. 5-8. 0 8. -10 The arguments are not relevant The arguments ar e somewhat The arguments are relevant to The arguments are more often than not The arguments are relevant to The arguments are highly relevant to Arguments, structure and to the essay question and do notrelevant to the essay question the essay question but may not relevant to the essay question the essay question and mostly the essay question and support the gumminess support the thesis statement or but do not support the thesis support the thesis statement and somewhat support the thesis support the thesis statement thesis statement The splits are not well statement and Some paragraphs are structured statement Each paragraph is structured Each paragraph is structured well structured and The paragraphs are not well well but may or may not have a Each paragraph is usually well with one topic and with one topic and lowest The date does not match the structured and single topic. structured well with one topic concluding sentence. sentence which links back to the draft in the introduction. The sequence does not match the Some paragraphs are colligate and and concluding sentence. near paragraphs and ideas are thesis statement. outline in the introduction. The sequence may or may not Most paragraphs are intelligibly clearly linked and All paragraphs and ideas are match the outline in the linked and The sequence matches the outlineeffectively linked and introduction. The sequence matches the outlinein the introduction. The sequence matches the outline in in the introduction. the introduction. /25 0-7. 0 7. 5-12. 0 12. 5-16. 0 16. 5-18. 5 19. 0-21. 0 21. 5-25 Use of evidence there is no supporting evidence The evidence that is presented The evidence that is presented The evidence that is presented The evidence that is presented The evidence that is presented for the arguments presented. Does not incorporate at least(prenominal) 3 Incorporates at least 3 of the Incorporates at least 3 of the Incorporates at least 3 of the Incorporates at least 3 of the of the necessary readings required readings required readings required readings required readings Is limited and Supports the arguments but Supports the arguments Supports the arguments Supports the arguments from a number Is a descriptive summary. Is a descriptive summary. Elaborates on its relevancy and Elaborates on its relevance and of perspectives Uses descriptive ethics. Uses descriptive and analytical Evaluates relevance and ethics. Uses descriptive, analytical and normative ethics. /20 0-5. 5 6. 0-9. 5 10. 0-12. 5 13. 0-14. 5 15. 0-16. 5 17. 0-20 at that place is no conclusion. The conclusion The conclusion The conclusion The conclusion The conclusion Conclusion Summarises some of the Summarises some of the Summarises some of the main Summarises most of the main Summarises all the main arguments in information presented in the information presented in the arguments in the proboscis of the arguments i n the automobile trunk of the the clay of the essay body but body and essay and essay and Restates the thesis statement and Does not restate the thesis Restates the thesis statement. Restates the thesis statement. Restates the thesis statement. Makes a final comment without statement. introducing young ideas. /10 0 . 5-4. 5 5. 0-6. 0 6. 5-7. 0 7. 5-8. 0 8. -10 Academic writing style Does not use Does not use May or may not use Sometimes uses Mostly uses incessantly uses purpose and subjective Objective and subjective Objective and subjective Objective and subjective Objective and subjective Objective and subjective vocabulary language suitably language appropriately language appropriately language appropriately language appropriately appropriately Connections surrounded by ideas and Connections between ideas and Connections between ideas and Clear and logical connections Concise and formal ideas Concise and formal ideas sentences AND sentences o r sentences and/or between ideas and sentences Clear and logical connections Clear and logical connections Formal academic writing. Formal academic writing. Formal academic writing. and/or between ideas and sentences between ideas and sentences and Formal academic writing. and/or Formal academic writing. Formal academic writing. /5 0-1. 0 1. 5-2. 0 2. 5-3. 0 3. 5 4. 0 4. 5-5. 0 REFERENCING In-text citation Few or no resources are Some resources are hold Most resources are adjudge Most resources are acknowledged All resources are acknowledged butAll resources are acknowledged acknowledged OR May or may not fare the Harvard but Accurately follow the Harvard Do not accurately follow the Accurately follow the Harvard Do not follow the Harvard arrangement system OR Do not accurately follow the system and Harvard system and system and OR Uses too many direct quotes. Harvard system and May or may not use too many directQuotes minimally and Uses own words. Uses direct quotes excessively. May or may not use too many directquotes. appropriately. quotes. /10 0-2. 5 3. 0-4. 5 5. 0-6. 0 6. 5-7. 0 7. 5-8. 0 8. -10 Reference list in that respect are less than 6 critical There are less than 6 scholarly There are at least 6 scholarly There are at least 7-9 scholarly There are 10 scholarly references There are 10 scholarly references references and references OR references references Most references are cited in the All references are cited in the Most references are not in the Most references are not in the Most references are cited in the Most references are cited in the body of the essay and/or body of the essay and body of the essay or body of the essay and body of the essay and body of the essay and/or The Harvard style is near perfect. The Harvard style is perfect. It is not in Harvard style. It is not in Harvard style. It is in Harvard style. The Harvard style is good. /10 0-2. 5 3. 0-4. 5 5. 0-6. 0 6. 5-7. 0 7. 5-8. 0 8. -10 GRAMMAR AND PRESENTATION Spelling, grammar &There are major grammatical errorsThere are a lot of spelling, There are some spelling, There are a few spelling, There are minor spelling, There are no spelling, grammatical punctuation which make the essay hard-fought to grammatical and punctuation grammatical and punctuation grammatical and punctuation grammatical and punctuation and punctuation errors. comprehend. errors. errors. errors. errors. /5 0-1. 0 1. 5-2. 0 2. 5-3. 0 3. 5 4. 0 4. 5-5. Presentation Does not Does not Uses estimate template Uses judging template Uses assessment template Uses assessment template Use assessment template Use assessment template OR Fills in some of the coversheet Fills in some of the coversheet Fills in most of the coversheet Fills in all of the coversheet ratify declaration on coversheet ANDFill in the coversheet OR decent correctly correctly correctly Adhere to word limit. Sign declaration OR S igns declaration and Ticks the boxes and signs Ticks the boxes and signs Ticks the boxes and signs Adhere to word limit. Adheres to word limit. declaration and declaration and declaration and Adheres to word limit. Adheres to word limit. Adheres to word limit. /5 0 0. 5-2. 2. 5-3. 0 3. 5 4. 0 4. 5-5. 0 additional comments Sub-Total Number of Days after-hours Late Penalties Total (100) (minus 10 marks/day) (100)