.

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Lottery Discussion Answers Essay

Shirley capital of Mississippi, The Lottery Discussion and Analysis QuestionsAnswer the pursual questions in complete sentences on your own paper. Provide quotations (with page/ railway numbers) from the spirit level to support your answers.1. wherefore has Jackson chosen common sight for her char symbolizeers? Could she have chosen characters from other levels of sophistication with the equivalent effect? What is the ridicule of the tone of this bill?2. What seems to have been the pilot purpose of the draftsmanship? What do people believe about it?3. Is it important that the master key gear mechanism for the lottery had been lost? What do you suppose the original ceremony was analogous? wherefore have some of the villages given up this practice? Why hasnt this one?4. What is the significance of Tessies final scream, It isnt fair, it isnt chastise? What aspect of the lottery does she explicitly challenge what aspect goes unquestioned?5. This is a different pattern of story when you read it for the second time. What elements ( such as Mrs. Hutchinsons test to have her daughter, Eva, draw with the family) might take on a different meaning the second time through?6. Some critics put forward that the story has an added symbolic meaning. Do you add up? If so, what is Shirley Jackson trying to publish us about ourselves? (Hint Consider that this story was written during the height of the turn out of Communism and the Soviet Union.)7. Is the lottery a collective act of massacre? Is it morally warrant? Is tradition sufficient justification for such actions? How would you answer to cultures that are different from ours that perform strange rites?8. Describe the appoint of popular opinion of the story. How does the point of view affect what we know about the situation? How does it deliver the storys suspense?Answers to Discussion Questions1. Why has Jackson chosen common people for her characters? Could she have chosen characters from other levels of sophistication with the same effect? What is the irony of the tone of this story?By choosing common people, Jackson is rendering to have the general indorser relate to the grotesque situation at hand. The dangers of imposture allegiance to tradition become more close to crustal plate when an average, small-town American population is the center of the action. It becomes more general and all-applicable. (Lines 1-17)2. What seems to have been the original purpose of the lottery? What do people believe about it?The original purpose of the lottery seems to have been some twisted sort of rain down dance ritual. As Old Man Warner explains, the old saying use to exclaim, Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon (line 122). It takes on an air of Aztec/ritualistic sacrifice, that by performing the blood ritual and sacrificing one, the needfully of the majority go away be met. If the ritual is not followed, society will collapse or so the townsfolk believe.3. Is it important tha t the original paraphernalia for the lottery had been lost? What do you suppose the original ceremony was like? Why have some of the villages given up this practice? Why hasnt this one?The loss of the original ceremonial paraphernalia is significant, as it suggests that the original meaning and reasons for the lottery have been lost to time. It is a ritual with no true purpose, other than that of blind allegiance to tradition. Some villages presumptively have matured beyond this ritual, but this one has not.4. What is the significance of Tessies final scream, It isnt fair, it isnt right? What aspect of the lottery does she explicitly challenge what aspect goes unquestioned?There are two ship canal to approach this question.1) From an in-character perspective, Tessie is objecting to the fact that she is the subject of the sacrifice, having been the winner of the lottery. She doesnt want to die, and is protesting however the fact that she has to die, not that people die in general.2 ) From an authorial / reader response perspective, Jackson challenges the reader to question the idea of conformity and blind allegiance to tradition. If we dont know why we observe a specific tradition, perhaps we should question its usefulness. Besides, its good to question and analyze.5. This is a different sort of story when you read it for the second time. What elements (such as Mrs. Hutchinsons attempt to have her daughter, Eva, draw with the family) might take on a different meaning the second time through?Tessies attempt to have her daughter draw with the family is a half-baked (and somewhat heartless) attempt to have a larger pool of winners (victims) to draw from. While reading, it sort of sounds like she wants an extra chance to win some money or something of that nature. In reality, she is trying to provide more of a buffer mingled with herself and being murdered.6. Some critics insist that the story has an added symbolic meaning. Do you agree? If so, what is Shirley Ja ckson trying to tell us about ourselves? (Hint Consider that this story was written during the height of the rise of Communism and the Soviet Union.)She is providing a symbol of societies such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, where great atrocities are commit under the indifferent watch of tradition-oriented conformists. She is trying to tell us that we should beguided by our moral compass, not merely by the expectations of society. If something is raw or wrong, we should stand up against it.7. Is the lottery a collective act of murder? Is it morally justified? Is tradition sufficient justification for such actions? How would you respond to cultures that are different from ours that perform strange rituals?Effectively, the lottery is by definition a collective act of murder, regardless of the reason it is held. Its innovation does, however, beg the question of whether tradition (and, by extension, moral relativism) supersedes any sort of universal morality. Is killing wrong no matter what, or does its mean purpose prosperity for the many at the expense of the few justified? Regardless of the answer, Jacksons message is that doing anything simply because its what eternally has been done is not an acceptable approach to life. We should question and analyze our traditions, and consider why we continue to observe them.8. Describe the point of view of the story. How does the point of view affect what we know about the situation? How does it preserve the storys suspense?

No comments:

Post a Comment